|
|
|
Scripture Readings for November 20001
If you would like to receive these daily scripture readings by email, click email list service.These short readings from the Christian Bible are read daily at community prayer in Taizé, an ecumenical and international Christian community in France. The Bible reference indicates a longer passage from scripture. You are invited to read the longer passage in the morning before you begin your daily activities, and then to ponder the reading, in silence and prayer, as it comes to mind during the day. For a brief explanation of how I am reading the Christian Bible, please go to Exegesis or to Witness.Jesus said: "Happy are they who hunger and thirst for justice, for they shall be filled. Happy are the merciful, for mercy will be shown to them." These teachings attributed to Jesus are known as the "beatitudes," the Latin word for "blessings," which is the traditional English translation for the Greek verb that begins each verse. These teachings are also found in the gospel of Luke in a slightly different form. In the gospel of Matthew the beatitudes are the beginning of what is known as the Sermon on the Mount for which that gospel is famous. In this sermon Jesus ascends a mountain and instructs his disciples. For the author of the gospel of Matthew, Jesus is the new Moses who interprets the law of God. In the gospel of Luke, Jesus comes down from a meeting in the hills with his disciples to deliver this and other teachings on a plain to the people who have come from both Gentile and Jewish cities to hear him and to be healed by him. For the author of the gospel of Luke, Jesus is not the new Moses who is reaffirming and reforming Jewish law, but a teacher and healer whose authority and power is recognized by both Jews and Gentiles. The parallel beatitude in the gospel of Luke is: "Happy are you that hunger now, for you shall be satisfied." (Lk. 6:21) In the gospel of Luke, Jesus promises the people that their hunger will be satisfied. In the gospel of Matthew, Jesus promises those who hunger for justice, that there will be justice and that those who show mercy will receive mercy. The meanings in the two gospel accounts are not the same, but each promises that God's intervention in history will bring an end to human injustice and the hunger that results from human greed. These words of hope have inspired Christians throughout the centuries to struggle for justice and to feed those who are hungry. Paul writes: "Train yourself to live in godliness: it holds out promise both for the present life and the life to come." Paul is giving instructions to Timothy, his younger co-worker in the mission to the Gentiles. Here we see Paul emphasizing that how a person lives is crucial to the witness of the church and to salvation itself. In his letters Paul argues that faith alone is required for salvation, because he is arguing against other apostles who are asserting that Christians need also to live by the rules of Jewish law. But Paul is not opposed to "good works." He believes, however, that these are a manifestation of faith rather than a requirement for salvation. The church is called to practice what it preaches in every generation. The gospel of love and forgiveness is a challenge for all Christians to live out, as it expects a great deal of each of us. Can we trust in God so much, that we can forgive those who harm us? Will our faith motivate us to reach out in love to those who do not agree with out beliefs? Can we witness to the love of God in the name of Jesus without condemning those who are not Christians? This is the life to which Paul call's Timothy. Can we also embrace this call? "Forgive your neighbor any wrongs. For if someone nurses anger against another, how can they then ask for healing from God?" Sirach, sometimes called "Ecclesiasticus" or "The Wisdom of Jesus the Son of Sirach," is in the Roman Catholic Bible but not in Protestant Bibles. It was part of the Septuagint, the Greek translation of the Hebrew Bible that was used by Paul and the Greek-speaking church as "scripture," and it was included in the Old Testament of the Bible that the church of the Roman Empire approved in the fourth century CE. But the rabbis who established the Jewish canon in Hebrew at the end of the first century CE dropped Sirach and other books, known since then in the church as "The Apocrypha," from Jewish scripture. And the Protestant reformers of the sixteenth century translated the Old Testament from the Hebrew canon, rather than from the Greek Bible of the first few centuries. The Latin Bible in the Roman Catholic Church kept the books of the Apocrypha in the Bible, although noting the change in Jewish scripture. Thus, Roman Catholic Bibles today have within them Sirach, and Protestant Bibles omit this book and the other books of the Apocrypha. The author of this book, we are told in the text, was a teacher in Jerusalem and wrote this book in Hebrew about 180 BCE. About fifty years later the author's grandson translated the book into Greek. The book is full of instruction for young men on ethical and religious practice, and thus is similar in content to Proverbs. The passage suggested for today emphasizes forgiveness and mercy. It is important for Christians to see that this was part of Jewish teaching two centuries before the time of Jesus. Jesus and Paul would both have been familiar with this book and with this passage urging Jews to forgive their neighbors, rather than holding onto anger and resentment. We can say, therefore, that they built on this foundation in their preaching and ministry. "Who could condemn us? Christ Jesus, who died - more than that, who was raised to life - is at the right hand of God, interceding for us." Paul writes to the Christians in Rome, "If God is for us, who is against us?" (Rm. 8:31) And he goes on to affirm that nothing "will be able to separate us from the love of God in Christ Jesus our Lord." (8:39) The faith that Paul proclaims is that Jesus Christ has interceded with God on behalf of all humanity so that all those with faith will not be condemned for their sins but will know forgiveness "in Christ." This powerful witness helped to bring Gentiles and Jews together in a new community of faith that over centuries has become the church, as we know it today. Can we proclaim in our time that God's forgiving love in Christ extends to all those who embrace life with faith? In Romans 9-11 Paul argues that this love includes the Jews who have rejected Jesus as the Messiah as well as those who have accepted him, because Paul believes that this conflict over the witness of the church is part of God's plan. Might we today believe that God is working out his will through other religious traditions as well as through the witness of the church? Can our faith be strong enough to affirm that Christ Jesus died even for those who do not put their trust in him? Jesus sent out the twelve, saying: "Proclaim that the kingdom of heaven is close at hand. Freely you have received, freely give. In this passage Jesus names his twelve disciples and then sends them out to "the lost sheep of Israel." (Mt. 10:6) He explicitly tells his disciples not to go to Gentile or to Samaritan towns, but only to Jewish communities. The gospel of Mark contains the same list of disciples and they, too, are sent out to preach and heal, but in this gospel Jesus does not restrict their mission to Jews. (Mk. 3:13-19, 6:7) The gospel of Luke also does not include the restriction that appears in the gospel of Matthew. ("Lk. 9:1), and it names "Judas the son of James" rather than "Thaddaeus" as the eleventh disciple. (Lk. 6:12-16) The gospel of Matthew seems to have been written for a largely Jewish Christian community, whereas the gospels of Mark and Luke are directed to Christian communities dominated by Gentiles. This might explain why only the gospel of Matthew limits the ministry of the disciples to the Jewish community. It is impossible to say which is historically accurate. It is clear, however, from the Acts of the Apostles and from Paul's letters, that the church in Jerusalem led by the disciples of Jesus required Gentile converts to the church to keep at least some of the tenets of Jewish law. And in the gospel of Matthew, Jesus tells his disciples that every rule of the law of Moses is to be adhered to until "heaven and earth pass away." (Mt. 5:17-20) There was a conflict in the early church about requiring Gentile converts to keep Jewish law, and it appears that the gospel of Matthew is asserting a position close to that of the church in Jerusalem and contrary to the teaching of Paul and the other apostles to the Gentiles. "Be joyful in your hope, steadfast in hardship, faithful in prayer. Be always ready to offer hospitality." In this passage Paul argues that there are a variety of gifts of the Spirit, so each person is called to nurture the life of the church in terms of the gifts that he (or she) has received. Paul gives priority to prophecy, service and teaching, which it seems he would count among his own gifts of the Spirit. Then he urges the Christians in Rome to love one another and to hold fast to what is good. His advice is important for the church today. Can we be faithful in prayer? Can the church show through its hospitality and joy that it is the body of Christ in the world? Can we, who witness to the God who, in Christ, loved us beyond measure, manifest that love for the world? "Keep watch, for you know neither the day nor the hour." This passage relates a story about ten maidens, apparently friends of a bride, who light lamps and wait at the home of the bride for the groom to come for the marriage feast. Five take oil to replenish their lamps, but five take only their lamps. The groom is delayed, and when it is announced that he is about to arrive the five maidens who did not bring extra oil find that their lamps are no longer lit. They ask the other maidens for oil, but these "wise maidens" reply that they do not have any oil to spare. The "foolish maidens" leave to buy oil, and when they return the bridegroom has already come and the door to the home is closed. When the maidens who are late say, "Lord, lord, open to us," they are told, apparently by the bridegroom: "Truly, I say to you, I do not know you." Then the narrator of the gospel of Matthew says, "Keep watch, for you know neither the day nor the hour." A literal reading of this story might conclude that we have to be always prepared in order not to miss being allowed in for marriage feasts (or other parties). The one line verse printed above may also be read more generally to mean that we should be prepared for the unexpected. In the context of the gospel of Matthew, however, we read this as a parable about the coming kingdom of heaven (God) and being ready to enter it. And as we read further in chapter 25 of the gospel of Matthew, we find that this kingdom will begin with the coming of the Son of man in his glory to judge all the peoples of the earth. These he will judge not on the basis of their beliefs (about reading scripture, for instance), but by their behavior toward "the least" of those among them. The gospel asks of us: "Have you fed the hungry? Have you visited the sick and those in prison? Have you clothed the naked? Have you welcomed the stranger?" Good questions, I think, even for our own time. "Christ came to announce the joyful message of peace: peace to those who are far away, peace to those who are near. Through him, in one Spirit, we all have free access to the Father." It is clear from verse 11 of Ephesians 2 that Paul is writing to a church that has Gentile as well as Jewish Christians. Paul tells the Gentile Christians that they were "without God in the world," (v. 12) but that Christ "has broken down the wall of hostility, by abolishing in his flesh the law of commandments and ordinances, that he might create in himself one new man in place of the two, so making peace, and might reconcile us both to God in one body through the cross, thereby bringing the hostility to an end." (verses 15-16) We see clearly here how the Greek-speaking churches that Paul was organizing were places where Gentile and Jewish Christians could enter into community together, as long as the Jewish Christians did not enforce the Jewish law within the life of the community. This is why in Galatians 2 Paul spoke out so strongly against Peter and James, at the time the leadership of the church in Jerusalem imposed Jewish kosher laws on the Christian community in Antioch. When Peter refused to eat with Gentiles, Paul accused him of undermining the unity of the church. In our time, of course, there are no longer issues dividing Jewish and Gentile Christians. Now, however, there are issues dividing Jews and Christians and also Christians and people of other faith communities. How are these communities of faith to be reconciled? Paul fought in the first century for a more inclusive form of community and against strict rules of belief and practice that he felt denied the reconciling work of God in Christ. Are our churches imposing rules that do not reflect the love of God in Christ? What might we learn from the preaching of Paul today? How might our communities of faith be more inclusive? Jesus said: "If anyone wants to follow me, let them renounce themselves and take up their cross and follow me." Verse 24 actually reads in most English translations of the New Testament something like this: "If any man would come after me, let him deny himself and take up his cross and follow me." The passage is translated above in a more inclusive way. Was Jesus only speaking of men following him? Obviously not, as women also followed. To make that clear the masculine language of this verse has been altered to be more inclusive. Is this changing the word of God? No, I don't think so. It is, however, translating an inclusive interpretation of the verse into English from the Greek in order to make the meaning clearer for our time. This kind of interpretation of scripture has always been the responsibility of the church. The point of the reading is that those who are faith to God, as we know God in Jesus the Christ, have to renounce self-centeredness and follow Jesus. In taking up our cross, do we have to be crucified? That would be a literal interpretation of this passage. Certainly, however, the reference to the cross is figurative. The cross is not just a means of killing a person but a symbol of sacrifice. Christians are called to sacrifice for the sake of the gospel. That is the way that this passage is generally interpreted within the church. And surely this is as true today, as it was in the first century, even though in our countries Christians may not be in danger of being martyred for their faith. But we have to sacrifice our self-interest, our self-righteousness, and our selfishness to be faithful. That is what being a Christian is all about. And the good news of the gospel is that the love of God, that we know in Christ, enables us to make that sacrifice, to pick up our "cross," and to discover eternal life with God, before death, in the life of faith. Jesus said: "Peace I leave you; my peace I give you. I do not give it to you as the world gives. Do not let your hearts be troubled or afraid." The fourteenth chapter of the gospel of John is one of the most beautiful and well-known portions of the Christian Bible. It is unique among the four gospels of the New Testament. In this chapter Jesus is questioned by three of his disciples, Thomas, Philip and Judas (not Iscariot), who never speak in the first three gospel accounts. Jesus answers their questions with statements that appear nowhere else in the New Testament. Jesus speaks of "the Father who dwells in" him (v. 10) He tells his disciples that he will pray the Father to give them "another Counselor" to be with them forever, "even the Spirit of truth." (verses 16-17) Jesus comforts his disciples about his coming departure by saying, "I am in my Father, and you in me, and I in you." (v. 20) He names the Counselor as "the Holy Spirit" who will teach the disciples all that they need to know. (v. 26) And, he gives them his peace. Christians have long wondered how the Jesus who proclaimed the kingdom of God (heaven) in parables, as the gospels of Matthew, Mark and Luke report, could also have spoken like this to his disciples? It might be, of course, that the author of the gospel of John simply has material from the life of Jesus with his disciples that was not available to the other gospel writers. But the gospel of John (and this wonderful passage from it) seems to be largely an interpretation of the meaning of the Jesus, rather than an historical report of his ministry. The truth of this reading, however, is the peace that it brings to our hearts, whether or not Jesus actually said these words to his disciples. "Make every effort to keep the unity of the Spirit through the bond of peace. There is one body and one Spirit, just as you have all been called to one hope." This is where we read the famous passage: "one Lord, one faith, one baptism, one God and Father of us all, who is above all and through all and in all." (v. 5) This letter may have been written by Paul, or by his disciples, to be circulated to many churches, because unlike the other letters attributed to Paul in the New Testament this letter is not addressed to a particular church or person. Galatians is addressed to the "churches of Galatia," and Romans is addressed to "all God's beloved in Rome." Paul's two letters to the Corinthians are addressed to "the church of God, which is at Corinth," and the letter to the Philippians begins with the statement, "To all the saints in Christ Jesus who are at Philippi." Ephesians, on the other hand, is addressed to "the saints who are also faithful in Christ Jesus." It may be that a copy of this letter was known in the early church to have been found among Christians in Ephesus and so, when the letter was included in the New Testament canon, it was named "Ephesians." The letter urges unity among Jewish and Gentile Christians in the church, and Paul uses images to press his point. There is one body, one Spirit, one hope, one baptism, and one God. So there must be, Paul believes, one church where both Gentile and Jewish Christians witness to the good news of salvation in Jesus Christ. Paul could hardly have foreseen the array (or disarray?) of churches that carry the banner of Christ today. It is sometimes said that the lack of unity of the church is a scandal, and that would seem to be the point of this letter. But more accurately, perhaps, we might say that the disunity of the church is a reflection of its humanity. The church is made up of and represents the understanding of people. In may point to what is divine, but the church is very human. Jesus said: "The kingdom of heaven is like the yeast a woman took and mixed in with a large amount of flour until the whole thing rose." This passage contains the parables of the mustard seed and the yeast (leaven). These two parables also appear in Luke 13:18-19) in a very similar form. They must come from a collection of teachings attributed to Jesus that the authors of these two gospels had, but the authors of the gospels of Mark and John do not seem to know of this collection. The parable of the mustard seed is usually interpreted to mean that something small may grow to something large. The parable of the yeast seems to imply that something that disappears may, nonetheless, make all the difference for the end result. These two meanings, of course, are interpretations rather than literal readings of the parables. Literally, the passages say that a mustard seed grows to be a mustard plant, and that yeast makes bread rise. But the parables each contain the phrase, "The kingdom of heaven is like . . .." This phrase denotes a simile and suggests that a literal meaning is not intended. These images are not the kingdom of heaven, but they are intended to suggest some meaning to us about the kingdom of heaven. The parables leave it to the reader to interpret this meaning. At times in the gospels the narrator gives an interpretation of a parable, but that is not the case here. What might we read into the parable of yeast? It concerns a woman making bread. If she is making "the kingdom of heaven," we might conclude that God is feminine. If the point is that the ingredients for making the kingdom are already "mixed into" the world and our lives, then the parable might mean that the kingdom will come in its own time. Perhaps the yeast represents Jesus, who dies for our sake and thus "disappears" but, at the same time, causes the church to come into being. Or, we might understand the bread as the faith that rises in our hearts. Clearly, there is no one meaning of each of these parables that you, or I, can claim to be the "true" meaning. We cannot know the meaning intended by Jesus or by the author of the gospel. We can say, however, that a literal reading of this passage was not intended by either, and thus it would be untrue to the New Testament to read this passages literally. These figurative teachings prod the church in every generation to respond more faithfully. Jesus said: "The Holy Spirit, whom the Father will send in my name, will teach you all things and remind you of everything I have told you." There is much in the Old Testament about the Spirit, the Spirit of God, and the Spirit of the Lord, and there is frequent mention of the Holy One of Israel, especially in Isaiah. I have found, however, only three places in the Old Testament where the adjective "holy" precedes the noun "spirit," and in each of these the phrase is clearly attributing holiness to God. Psalm 51:11 reads, "Cast me not away from thy presence, and take not thy holy Spirit from me." Isaiah 63:10-11 refers twice to "his holy Spirit" where the reference is obviously to God. Thus, the phrase in the New Testament, "the Holy Spirit," which appears in all four of the gospels, in Acts of the Apostles, and in Paul's letters, represents a break with the understanding of ancient Israel. The affirmation of the Holy Spirit in the New Testament is what leads the church later to affirm a trinitarian understanding of God. There is no explicit reference to the Trinity in the New Testament, and clearly that idea was not formulated in the life of the church until after the Christian canon of scripture was authorized in the fourth century CE. But the notion that God is present to individual Christians, and in the life of the church, as the Holy Spirit was deeply rooted in the Christian witness of the first century. So, it is not hard to see how the church came to affirm faith in God the Father, God the Son, and God the Holy Spirit. An understanding of God, as Creator, and as present not only in Jesus but also in the Holy Spirit, which animated the life of the church after Jesus was no longer present, led to the Christian doctrine of the Trinity. In a parable, the master said to his faithful servant, "Well done, good and faithful servant. You have been faithful with a little, I will entrust you with much more. Come and share your master's happiness!" This passage is taken from what is generally known as the parable of the talents. It is about a man who gives three of his servants some talents (a talent in first century Palestine was a lot of money) before leaving on a journey. The servant receiving five talents trades them and makes five more. The servant receiving two talents similarly makes two more. But the servant with one talent buries his talent, and thus has only the one talent to show his master when he returns. The master welcomes the first two servants to share his happiness, but he takes the talent from the third servant, gives it to the first servant who already has ten talents, and orders the "worthless servant" cast into "the outer darkness" where "men will weep and gnash their teeth." The literal meaning of this parable is that if your master gives you money, you had better invest it. But the parable is placed by the author of the gospel of Matthew just after the parable of the ten maidens waiting for the bridegroom to celebrate his marriage feast and just before the announcement of the coming Son of man and the great judgment of all peoples. Thus, from its context we know that this parable concerns the kingdom of heaven (there is an explicit reference in the parable of the ten maidens) and the coming judgment. It does not simply concern money, but is about what is entrusted to us by our master. Having said that, we are left to draw our own conclusions. Will those who fall short of their master's expectations be cast literally into "the outer darkness," or might we say that this is figurative language connoting despair and separation from God's love? In reading a parable that is not intended to be taken literally, because it is about the kingdom of heaven rather than money entrusted to servants when their master is away, we should reject the conclusion that the punishment in the parable for unworthiness is to be taken literally. Moreover, when the gospel of Matthew is read in the context of the entire New Testament, we find that the other gospels and the letters of Paul have a more reassuring sense of God's forgiveness for his servants, who fail to live as creatively as they might have. Jesus said: "Whoever makes himself humble like a child is greatest in the kingdom of Heaven. Anyone who welcomes a little child in my name welcomes me." The gospel of Matthew reports that when the disciples ask Jesus, "Who is the greatest in the kingdom of heaven?" he tells them they must be like children. The same argument among the disciples is also reported in the gospels of Mark and Luke. In Mark 9:33-37 and Luke 9:46-48 Jesus also points to the humility of a child and tells his disciples that they must serve others to be first. Here is a point where the first three gospels are in full agreement. To be a follower of Jesus is to be a servant, not someone who demands that others serve him. Of course, Christians and the church throughout history fail to live up to this call to be the servant of others. But this teaching is one of the great challenges of the church in every generation. In our time, when the world values assertiveness and we are encouraged to "sell" ourselves, can we be humble and put serving others above our own careers? What would the witness of the church be, if we embraced this calling? "God is love. Whoever lives in love lives in God, and God in them." This is a favorite passage from the New Testament. A more familiar translation from the Greek is: "God is love, and he who abides in love abides in God, and God in him." This reading uses the phrase "lives in" for "abides" in order to put the idea in contemporary English, and it replaces the masculine third person pronouns "he" and "him" with "whoever" and "them" in order to be more inclusive. If the translators of the New Testament thought that God has spoken the Greek text word for word, they could not make such a change. But they assume only that the meaning of the text, not the literal word-for-word translation, should be rendered into English. The church does not confess that God spoke Hebrew and Greek, rather than English or Chinese, but testifies that the meaning of the New Testament may be expressed and understood in any language as the inspired word of God. The purpose of this passage, of course, has to do with the mystery of God, who loves humanity more than we can imagine, and who is present in the love of those who trust in love. The author of this letter affirms that the love of God "is perfected with us," (v. 17) and asserts that we love because God loved us first. The letter emphasizes that Christians cannot love God and hate their neighbors. Love is such that it requires loving not only God, but also loving our neighbors. November 17, Sirach 14:1-6, 14-16 "Happy are they who are not in anguish over their failings and who do not founder in despair. For if they are hard upon themselves, to whom will they be kind?" Ecclesiasticus, of the Wisdom of Jesus the Son of Sirach, is not in Protestant versions of the Christian Bible, but it is in Roman Catholic Bibles. The book was included in the Greek version of the Jewish scriptures that was read by Paul and other Greek-speaking Christians of the first few centuries of the church, so it was included in the Christian Bible in the fourth century when the church had the power of Emperor Constantine behind it to decree what was Christian scripture. Because the Jewish rabbis at the end of the first century CE had omitted Sirach from their Hebrew Bible, it was not included by Protestant reformers in their translations of the Old Testament. Is Sirach scripture or isn't it? The answer depends on what historical community of faith you are in, and when you ask the question. For Greek-speaking Jews Sirach was scripture up into the first few centuries of the Christian era. For Hebrew-speaking Jews it was scripture (at least for some) before 100 CE but not after that date. For Christians who read the Bible in Greek, it was and is scripture. For Christians who later read the Bible in Latin, it was in the Bible and used but its omission from the Jewish canon was noted. For Roman Catholic Christians today, Sirach is in the Bible and is regularly used in lectionary readings. This teaching from Sirach urges us to accept our shortcomings. If we cannot forgive ourselves, how will we forgive others? Jesus said: "Anyone who loves their life will lose it, while anyone who is not attached to their life in this world will keep it for eternal life." In this passage the gospel reports that Jesus says: "Unless a grain of wheat falls into the earth and dies, it remains alone; but if it dies, it bears much fruit." (v. 24) The literal meaning of this text is that wheat must be planted, if it is to grow and produce a harvest. It seems likely, however, that the gospel is not teaching basic agriculture, but is using language figuratively. When the gospel follows the statement about planting wheat with a statement about losing this life and gaining eternal life, we immediately assume that the two statements are related and should be interpreted together. But the relationship is not obvious. Our life is not like a grain of wheat. The grain is only potential life, whereas we are actually alive. But the form of the grain must be given up, if the wheat is to grow and produce a harvest. Must the form of our life also be given up, if we are to bring in the harvest of the kingdom of God? The gospel of John does not include parables about the kingdom of God, unlike the first three gospels in the New Testament. It speaks here of gaining eternal life, and it uses strong language about hating life in this world. In the first three gospels Jesus does not seem to hate life in the world. In fact, he is accused of enjoying it too much, for he eats and drinks with sinners. Nonetheless, there is a sense in all the New Testament writings that life, as we know it, is coming and must come to an end in order for God to create what Isaiah 65:17 and the Revelation of John 21:01 refer to as a new heaven and a new earth. A third time, Jesus said to Peter, "Do you love me?" Peter was hurt that he asked him a third time, "Do you love me?" and said, "Lord, you know everything; you know I love you." This account of a resurrection appearance beside the Sea of Tiberias (Galilee) is found only in the gospel of John. Peter and other disciples are fishing when they see Jesus on the shore. They join him for a breakfast of fish and bread. It is after they have eaten that Jesus asks Peter if he loves him. When Peter says he does, Jesus replies, "Feed my lambs." Jesus asks a second time, receives the same answer, and repeats his request. Then he asks a third time. Is he scolding Peter, or testing him? And what does Jesus mean? The literal meaning cannot be the intended meaning. Peter is not being asked to tend a herd of sheep. In the context of the gospel we quickly interpret "sheep" to mean those who follow Jesus. But why is this request repeated three times? Is this merely for emphasis? Or does repetition suggest that Peter does not understand the implications of his answer and needs, therefore, to hear the question again. The reading ends with Jesus saying to Peter that, in his old age, he will be bound and taken where he does not want to go. The narrator adds that by this Jesus meant to describe Peter's death. Perhaps Jesus is thinking all along that Peter's responsibility for the church will lead to his death. Or, this may be merely the conclusion of the narrator of the story. Whatever Jesus or the author of the gospel intended, we are left with the clear impression that doing what Jesus has asked will prove difficult and even dangerous for Peter. Might that be true for us as well? "You guide me, Lord, on paths of righteousness. Even though I walk through the valley of the shadow of death I will fear no evil, for you are with me." This is probably the most well known psalm in the Bible. Many Christians can recite it from memory. It is often included in funeral and memorial services, and I repeated it at the time of my father's death. We all fear walking through the valley of the shadow of death. The language here is poetic and all the more powerful. Death does not cast a shadow over a valley, but we know what the psalmist means. Death is like a dark valley, and we are afraid when we consider that there is no way to avoid it. The psalmist was not writing for Christians, of course, but for Israelites. Nonetheless, the God that he affirms is with us when we face death is the same God that Jesus called Father and that we refer to as Father, Son and Holy Spirit. Christian doctrine affirms the Trinity, but God is nonetheless one, the Holy One, the only God of creation, the God of Israel and the God of Christian faith. Six centuries after the birth of the church Muhammad will proclaim there is but one God. He will use the Arabic word "Allah" to name that God, but this is simply Arabic for "one God" or "the one God." It is not a personal name for God, and Muhammad does not believe that Allah is different than the God of Abraham, Moses and Jesus. Muhammad does, however, preach a revelation that differs from the Jewish and Christian witness to God, and so a new religion is born. Jesus said: "In truth I tell you, whatever you did for one of the least of these brothers and sisters of mine, you did for me." This passage comes from what is known as the Great Judgment. In the gospel of Matthew Jesus describes the coming of the Son of man in all his glory to judge the nations. He uses an image of a shepherd separating sheep and goats to indicate how the Son of man will sort people out, inviting into the kingdom those who had given him food and drink when he was hungry, welcomed him when he was a stranger, clothed him when he was naked, and visited him when he was in prison. When those who are being invited into the kingdom say they do not recall treating him as he has described, he says that when they did these things for "one of the least of my brothers and sisters," they did it for him. The translation from the Greek is usually "brethern" rather than "brothers and sisters," but we are using the latter phrase to be sure that the reader interprets "brethern" to include women as well as men. By brethern, or brothers, the gospel seems to mean other members of the church. If the reference were merely to poor people, or to the least of those among our people, then there would be no reason to refer to them as "brethern" or "brothers." We see, therefore, that this is not merely a teaching about the end of time, but is intended to motivate Christian readers to care for "the least" in the church. It does not seem that the author of the gospel is thinking about those outside the church, but in the context of the New Testament we may say that all people, as children of God, are our "brothers and sisters." So, we might take this reading to mean that by caring for anyone, whose needs are greater than our own, we care for Christ. "Seek God and his strength, seek God's face at all times. Remember the wonders God has done. This psalm recites the wondrous deeds that God has done for his people. It begins: "O give thanks to the LORD, call on his name, make known his deeds among the peoples!" The word "LORD" is used to translate the Hebrew four-letter representation for God, YHWH, which is sometimes written "Yahwah" or more traditionally "Jehovah." In verse 7 the LORD is said to be "the LORD our God." The English word "God" is used to translate the Hebrew word "El" or its plural "Elohim." In the Old Testament these two words are often used as synonyms, and so the free translation of verse 4 above refers to God rather than to LORD, which is a direct translation of the Hebrew. Traditions about YHWH were merged with traditions about El/Elohim in the development of the Hebrew scriptures, and so the character of God/LORD became more complex. In the New Testament the word Lord is used for Jesus Christ, and Old Testament scriptures about the LORD are taken to refer to the Lord Jesus Christ. In this process of character development the God of the Bible not only reveals his will in relationship to those who are faithful, but in doing so discovers who he is. Christians believe that this self-discovery and self-revelation have marked the life of the church through the work of the Holy Spirit. Peter said: "I now really understand that God has no favorites, but that in every nation he loves those who revere him and act justly." The story of Cornelius is related by the author of Acts to explain how Gentiles came to be included in the church. Cornelius is a God-fearing man, but he is a Roman centurion. In a vision an angel tells Cornelius to send for Peter, who the following day has a vision telling him that all foods are clean. Peter is told by the Spirit to go to see Cornelius, so he travels to Caesarea and there violates Jewish law by entering the house of a Gentile. Peter preaches to the Gentiles gathered there and sees the Holy Spirit come upon them, so he baptizes them in the name of Jesus Christ. It is hard for us to imagine today that Jesus was a Jew who called twelve other Jews to be his disciples and, according to the gospel of Matthew, sent these disciples only to teach and heal among Jews. (Mt. 10:5-6) In the account of Acts, the church begins with Jews and only becomes Gentile after the Holy Spirit comes upon them and Paul's ministry to the Gentiles proves successful. The church in Jerusalem, which was led by the disciples of Jesus and by James, the brother of Jesus, remained close to its Jewish roots until Jerusalem was destroyed in 70 CE by Roman armies and the Jewish temple leveled. We can see this in Acts, because it reports that the newly baptized were going daily to the Jewish temple, (Acts 2:46) and we know only Jews were permitted to enter the temple. The church's proclamation that God loves men and women in every nation, who are faithful and act justly, was self-serving, because it enabled Jews and Gentiles to worship together in a new community of faith. But throughout history this witness has undermined exclusive ideologies based on race or national identity, although the church has often failed to live up to its own vision of a loving and a forgiving God. The challenge remains today, both for the church and for the world. God says: "I will go before you and will level the mountains so that you may know that I am the LORD, the one who calls you by name." In this passage God is speaking through the prophet, Isaiah, to Cyrus, the kind of Persia. The Persians will defeat the Babylonians and release the Israelites in Babylon from captivity, allowing them to return to Judah. Because Cyrus will accomplish this, he is called "anointed" (in Hebrew "messiah" or in Greek "christ"). The passage affirms that the defeat of the Babylonians and the return of the Israelites to Judah is the will of the LORD and is being accomplished by Cyrus, because he is God's messiah (anointed one). Most Christians are surprised to find a Persian king referred to as "messiah" in the Old Testament, which in the original Greek Bible would make Cyrus God's christ. Yet, this is the literal or plain meaning of the text. The church interprets this passage to mean that Cyrus is God's chosen instrument and reserves the word "Christ" for Jesus alone. The church never read this passage from Isaiah literally, but always read its understanding of Jesus Christ into the text. Jesus said: "It is by your love for one another that everyone will recognize you as my disciples." In this part of the gospel of John, Jesus is preparing his disciples for his death. "As I said to the Jews so now I say to you," he says, "where I am going you cannot come." (v. 33) What a strange statement! Jesus is speaking to his disciples, who are all Jews, so what is the distinction he is making between his disciples and those he calls "the Jews"? In fact, the gospel of John refers to those who oppose Jesus as "the Jews." In the church today we need to clarify that this attack on "the Jews" in the gospel of John does not refer to all Jews and is not a justification for Christian anti-Semitism. The persecution of Jews by Christians throughout history shows that this is not an unimportant concern. Verse 35 of this passage is quoted above and points to the love that the disciples are to have for each other. This is not a commandment to love our enemies, as we find in the gospels of Matthew and Luke, (Mt. 5:43-48, Lk. 6:27-31) nor even to love our neighbors, which might be taken to mean "our people" even if they are not part of our community of faith. In the gospel of John the love that Jesus commands is faithfulness among the disciples, as they face opposition and efforts to divide them. This will mark them to others as disciples of Jesus, after he is no longer present to lead them. Jesus said: "I praise you, Father, Lord of heaven and earth, for having revealed to little children what you have hidden from the learned and clever." This statement also appears in Luke 10:21-22. There is no explanation given in either gospel, so we are left to interpret the meaning. In the gospel of Matthew the preceding passage concerns the judgment that will come upon the Jewish cities that have not responded to the ministry of Jesus. In the gospel of Luke, however, the preceding passage depicts the disciples rejoicing because of the success of their ministry. Do little children understand the judgment predicted in the gospel of Matthew and the jubilation of the founders of the church described in the gospel of Luke? This is an instance in scripture where the immediate context is of little help in deriving a meaning. A literal reading would conclude that children understand what eludes the wisdom of their elders. Generally, however, the church has read this passage to mean that the learned Jews and Gentiles who rejected the ministry of Jesus, as he pursued it and as his disciples continued it after his death, were wrong and misled by their "wisdom." It is not that children understand, but rather that the wise do not understand. A good interpretation would be that we do not have to be wise in order to understand the gospel and respond with faith. November 27, 2 Corinthians 9:6-11 Paul writes: "Anyone who sows generously will also reap generously. God loves the one who gives joyfully." Paul is taking up a collection for the poor of the church in Jerusalem. Apparently the church in Corinth is well off, because Paul speaks of their "abundance at the present time." So, he urges the Corinthians to be generous in their giving. We know from Galatians 1-2 that Paul is taking up this collection as part of his agreement with the leaders of the church in Jerusalem. His ministry to the Gentiles has been approved, he says, so long as he remembers the poor. (Gal. 2:10) Preaching generosity, therefore, is self-serving for Paul, because he needs to show the church in Jerusalem that he is keeping his part of the bargain. The sentiments of this passage, however, may be and usually are taken out of the context of Paul's letter to represent a general moral truth. God loves a joyful giver. That is worth saying, of course, and even more worth living. Can we give to the church and others joyfully, rather than reluctantly or simply out of a sense of duty? If so, we will experience a great blessing. November 28, 1 Corinthians 1:4-9 "God is faithful and has called you to love in communion with his Son, Jesus Christ." Paul writes these magnificent words to the Christians at Corinth, because there are problems there in the church. We see in verse 11 that there is quarreling in the church over whether the baptism by Apollos, Peter or Paul is better. These are false arguments, Paul says. Be grateful for the love of God and allow that love to heal the divisions in the community. Paul tells the Corinthians that the do not lack any of the spiritual gifts and that these will sustain them until the day of the Lord comes. Moreover, God will not abandon them, because in his Son, Jesus Christ, we know that God is faithful. So often the church is divided by quarrels over petty matters. The challenge is always to give ourselves to God through Christ, so that we may by the grace of God be loving and forgiving, as we know God is loving and forgiving. The Lord says: "I did not tell my people to search for me in chaos. I am the LORD God, who proclaims justice, who speaks what is true." In this chapter of Isaiah God says through the prophet that he will use Cyrus of Persia to defeat the Babylonians and begin the restoration of Israel. In verse 14 God says the wealth of the nations will be given to Israel, after God saves his chosen people and enables them to return to Judah. Then God proclaims that he is not to be found in the chaos that existed before creation, but is the LORD of history who will bring justice to Israel and to all the earth. This vision helped keep the Jewish people going through the centuries of their dispersion and persecution, and it has strengthened their resolve in this century to create a nation where all Jews will be welcome. Christians may read this passage to refer to a future hope at the end of time, but for Jews it is being realized now in the struggle for justice in Israel and among the nations of our world. Jesus saw Simon and his brother Andrew. They were casting a net into the lake, for they were fishermen. And he said to them, "Come follow me, and I will make you fishers of people." And at once they left their nets and followed him." In all four gospels Simon (Peter) and Andrew are the first disciples called by Jesus. The gospels of Mark (1:16-20) and Matthew tell the same story. In the gospel of Luke, Jesus tells Simon Peter where to cast his net, and when the fisherman hauls in a large catch he and his brother, Andrew, become disciples. (Lk. 5:1-11) In the gospel of John, Andrew is a disciple of John the Baptist, and he is directed by John to Jesus and brings alone his brother, Simon Peter. (Jn. 1:35-42) The stories are varied, but the result is the same. The early church knew that Andrew and Simon (Peter) were the first disciples of Jesus. These two men were called away from their livelihood not merely to follow a teacher but to take up a new work, as "fishers of men." The church proclaims that it has good news to offer to those who have not yet heard it. Being a Christian means witnessing to that good news, not merely enjoying it within the life of the church. The Catholic Church and the World Council of Churches distinguish between witnessing and proselytism, which they define as using coercion or propaganda. Every Christian is called to witness, but to be responsible to the gospel Christians must refrain from and resist proselytizing. |
|
Home Exegesis Scripture Worship Ethics Dialogue Parables Email 1 in Faith: A Christian Bible Study † Copyright © 2000 by Robert Traer |